Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Jonah Lehrer - The Psychology of Nature

Cool article from The Frontal Cortex, reposted at Wired. Nature has a powerful impact on our brain and mind (no, they are not the same thing). The more time we spend in nature, the healthier we become, in my opinion.

The Psychology of Nature

By Jonah Lehrer
August 19, 2010

In the late 1990s, Frances Kuo, director of the Landscape and Human Health Laboratory at the University of Illinois, began interviewing female residents in the Robert Taylor Homes, a massive housing project on the South Side of Chicago. Kuo and her colleagues compared women randomly assigned to various apartments. Some had a view of nothing but concrete sprawl, the blacktop of parking lots and basketball courts. Others looked out on grassy courtyards filled with trees and flowerbeds. Kuo then measured the two groups on a variety of tasks, from basic tests of attention to surveys that looked at how the women were handling major life challenges. She found that living in an apartment with a view of greenery led to significant improvements in every category.

What happened? Kuo argues that simply looking at a tree “refreshes the ability to concentrate,” allowing the residents to better deal with their problems. Instead of getting flustered and angry, they could stare out the window and relax. In other words, there is something inherently “restorative” about natural setting – places without people are good for the mind.

To better understand how nature works its psychological magic, let’s look at an important 2008 study led by Marc Berman, at the University of Michigan. (I’ve written about this study before.) Berman and colleagues outfitted undergraduates at the University of Michigan with GPS receivers. Some of the students took a stroll in an arboretum, while others walked around the busy streets of downtown Ann Arbor.

The subjects were then run through a battery of psychological tests. People who had walked through nature were in a better mood and scored significantly higher on a test of attention and working memory, which involved repeating a series of numbers backwards. In fact, just glancing at a photograph of nature led to measurable improvements, at least when compared with pictures of city streets.

Does this mean we should all flee the city? Of course not. It simply means that it’s a good idea to build a little greenery into our life. This isn’t a particularly new idea. Long before scientists fretted about the cognitive load of city streets, philosophers and landscape architects were warning about the effects of the undiluted city, and looking for ways to integrate nature into modern life. Ralph Waldo Emerson advised people to “adopt the pace of nature,” while the landscape architect Frederick Law Olmsted sought to create vibrant urban parks, such as Central Park in New York and the Emerald Necklace in Boston, that allowed the masses to escape the maelstrom of urban life. (As Berman told me, “It’s not an accident that Central Park is in the middle of Manhattan…They needed to put a park there.”)

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

"Nature has a powerful impact on our brain and mind (no, they are not the same thing)."

The brain and the mind are not the same thing, just as digestive systems and digestion are not the same thing.

I've never heard anyone suggest that digestion can occur or exist independent of a digestive system, but the majority of people in the US (according to polls) believe that minds or mindedness can occur or exist independent of brains (and thus after death, etc.). Curious to know what you think since you say that "brain and mind (...are not the same thing)."

william harryman said...

My personal sense is that "mind" and/or "consciousness" is the body-brain system embedded in a temporal, cultural, and environmental space.

But on the other hand, no brain, and the system ceases to function.

Anonymous said...

Thanks for your reply, WH. I agree with what you say. After writing my comment I Googled your name and saw something you wrote a year ago about a book by Alan Wallace (your review is at a site called Wildmind Buddhist Meditation). Completely agree with your take on Wallace's ideas about consciousness and what you aptly call his "anthropocentric ideas." Peace.